On 08/23/2016 07:24 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On 08/23/2016 05:05 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> This is trivial to do:
>>
>> - add flags argument to foo_rename()
>> - check if flags is zero
>> - assign foo_rename() to .rename2 instead of .rename
>>
>> This doesn't mean it's impossible to support RENAME_NOREPLACE for these
>> filesystems, but it is not trivial, like for local filesystems.
>> RENAME_NOREPLACE must guarantee atomicity (i.e. it shouldn't be possible
>> for a file to be created on one host while it is overwritten by rename on
>> another host).
>>
>> Filesystems converted:
>>
>> 9p, afs, ceph, coda, ecryptfs, exofs, kernfs, lustre, ncpfs, nfs, ocfs2,
>> orangefs.
>>
>> After this, we can get rid of the duplicate interfaces for rename.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Jan Harkes <jaharkes@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Boaz Harrosh <ooo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hi exofs is not a distributed file system in the nfs-client
> sense. All meta-data operations happen on the single exofs mount.
> The distribution of an exofs cluster is done by an NFSD-like daemon
> that supports pNFS, and an std pNFS-client.
> So the code you see below is just the same as an ext4 FS with
> a raid of iscsi devices below it. (Even if then later this FS is
> exported by an NFSD server)
>
> That said it is fine as is don't sweat over this unused FS so:
> ACK-by: Boaz Harrosh <ooo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> <>
>
>> diff --git a/fs/exofs/namei.c b/fs/exofs/namei.c
>> index 622a686bb08b..897280163f3c 100644
>> --- a/fs/exofs/namei.c
>> +++ b/fs/exofs/namei.c
>> @@ -227,7 +227,8 @@ static int exofs_rmdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
>> }
>>
>> static int exofs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
>> - struct inode *new_dir, struct dentry *new_dentry)
>> + struct inode *new_dir, struct dentry *new_dentry,
>> + unsigned int flags)
>> {
>> struct inode *old_inode = d_inode(old_dentry);
>> struct inode *new_inode = d_inode(new_dentry);
>> @@ -237,6 +238,9 @@ static int exofs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
>> struct exofs_dir_entry *old_de;
>> int err = -ENOENT;
>>
>> + if (flags)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
+ if (flags & ~RENAME_NOREPLACE)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
And move to the other patch if you feel like it
>> old_de = exofs_find_entry(old_dir, old_dentry, &old_page);
>> if (!old_de)
>> goto out;
>> @@ -310,7 +314,7 @@ const struct inode_operations exofs_dir_inode_operations = {
>> .mkdir = exofs_mkdir,
>> .rmdir = exofs_rmdir,
>> .mknod = exofs_mknod,
>> - .rename = exofs_rename,
>> + .rename2 = exofs_rename,
>> .setattr = exofs_setattr,
>> };
>>
> <>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
