> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c > index 427f830..8bb63f2 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c > @@ -682,9 +682,14 @@ struct inode *ext4_orphan_get(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino) > * is a valid orphan (no e2fsck run on fs). Orphans also include > * inodes that were being truncated, so we can't check i_nlink==0. > */ > - if (!ext4_test_bit(bit, bitmap_bh->b_data) || > - !(inode = iget(sb, ino)) || is_bad_inode(inode) || > - NEXT_ORPHAN(inode) > max_ino) { > + if (ext4_test_bit(bit, bitmap_bh->b_data)) > + goto out; > + > + inode = ext4_iget(sb, ino); > + if (IS_ERR(inode)) > + goto out; > + > + if (NEXT_ORPHAN(inode) > max_ino) { > ext4_warning(sb, __FUNCTION__, > "bad orphan inode %lu! e2fsck was run?", ino); > printk(KERN_NOTICE "ext4_test_bit(bit=%d, block=%llu) = %d\n", Same comments as for ext3 - I think you reversed ext4_test_bit() test and also the warning won't be issued in some cases which is wrong. > diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c > index 5fdb862..af98d07 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/namei.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c > @@ -1044,17 +1044,11 @@ static struct dentry *ext4_lookup(struct inode * dir, struct dentry *dentry, str > if (!ext4_valid_inum(dir->i_sb, ino)) { > ext4_error(dir->i_sb, "ext4_lookup", > "bad inode number: %lu", ino); > - inode = NULL; > - } else > - inode = iget(dir->i_sb, ino); > - > - if (!inode) > return ERR_PTR(-EACCES); -EIO more appropriate here? Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> SuSE CR Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html