Re: [RFC v3 0/2] Support for posix acls in fuse

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Aug 02 2016, Michael Theall <mtheall-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In case this has any bearing, my filesystem would in fact interpret the
> ACLs from the xattrs in order to apply them to the backing filesystem
> (which supports ACLs but through a non-xattr interface). In my
> particular case, it would be okay for the kernel to assume the
> inherited ACLs since it should be the same as if the kernel requested
> the ACLs after creation.

If I'm not mistaken, this means your file system will however be broken
by this change:

 - Remove passthrough of acl xattrs when fuse acl support is disabled or
   default_permissions is not used.

I assume you don't use default_permissons (because otherwise you
couldn't support ACLs), so this means with the patch you would no longer
get the ACLs in xattr forms.


Best,
-Nikolaus

-- 
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F

             »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux