Re: [PATCH 5/6] fs: befs: remove in vain variable assignment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 31/07/16 21:34, Salah Triki wrote:
> There is no need to init res, since it will be overwitten later by
> befs_fblock2brun().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Salah Triki <salah.triki@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/befs/linuxvfs.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/befs/linuxvfs.c b/fs/befs/linuxvfs.c
> index 6bc5b40..2b68c81 100644
> --- a/fs/befs/linuxvfs.c
> +++ b/fs/befs/linuxvfs.c
> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ befs_get_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t block,
>  	struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
>  	befs_data_stream *ds = &BEFS_I(inode)->i_data.ds;
>  	befs_block_run run = BAD_IADDR;
> -	int res = 0;
> +	int res;
>  	ulong disk_off;
>  
>  	befs_debug(sb, "---> befs_get_block() for inode %lu, block %ld",
> 

Looks good.

Thanks Salah,
Luis

Acked-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Pushed to the befs-next branch:
https://github.com/luisbg/linux-befs/tree/befs-next
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux