The only caller of befs_find_brun_direct is befs_fblock2brun, which
already validates that the block is within the range of direct blocks.
So remove the duplicate validation.
Signed-off-by: Salah Triki <salah.triki@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/befs/datastream.c | 8 --------
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/befs/datastream.c b/fs/befs/datastream.c
index 26cc417..e224b9a 100644
--- a/fs/befs/datastream.c
+++ b/fs/befs/datastream.c
@@ -249,17 +249,9 @@ befs_find_brun_direct(struct super_block *sb, const befs_data_stream *data,
int i;
const befs_block_run *array = data->direct;
befs_blocknr_t sum;
- befs_blocknr_t max_block =
- data->max_direct_range >> BEFS_SB(sb)->block_shift;
befs_debug(sb, "---> %s, find %lu", __func__, (unsigned long)blockno);
- if (blockno > max_block) {
- befs_error(sb, "%s passed block outside of direct region",
- __func__);
- return BEFS_ERR;
- }
-
for (i = 0, sum = 0; i < BEFS_NUM_DIRECT_BLOCKS;
sum += array[i].len, i++) {
if (blockno >= sum && blockno < sum + (array[i].len)) {
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
