On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 17:28:13 +1000 Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 22/07/16 00:48, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Greg Ungerer wrote: > >> Hi Nicolas, > >> > >> On 21/07/16 05:22, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > >>> This series provides the necessary changes to allow "flat" executable > >>> binaries meant for no-MMU systems to actually run on systems with a MMU. > >>> Also thrown in are various cleanups to binfmt_flat.c. > >> > >> I got to the bottom of why I couldn't run m68k flat binaries on > >> an MMU enabled m68k system. I had to fix the regs setup, with the > >> patch below. With this I can now run flat binaries on my ColdFire > >> MMU enabled system. > > > > Excellent! > > > >> This change is completely independent of your patch series so I'll > >> push this separately via the linux-m68k list and my m68knommu git > >> tree. > > > > OK. > > > > Who should merge my patch series at this point? > > If no-one else wants to carry it I can take it in the m68knommu > git tree. But I would want to be sure everyone is good with it > first. > > Alan: are you happy with where this is at? >From a first glance yes. I don't have time right now to give it a more detailed audit, but with the correct user accessors it looks as if all the ways you can mess up relocations simply result in faults or running a nonsense binary and the userspace failing. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
