On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Nick Piggin wrote: > > Removing a virtual mappping *must* be done with interrupts enabled > > since tlb_xx functions are called that rely on interrupts for > > processor to processor communications. > > These things will clash drastically with my lazy TLB flushing and scalability > work. Actually the lazy TLB flushing will provide a natural way to defer > unmapping at interrupt time, and the scalability work should make it > easier to vmap from interrupt context too, if you really need that. Both would be good to have. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
