On 9/12/07, Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Change the names of 'uid' and 'gid' parameters to the more appropriate
> 'dfltuid' and 'dfltgid'.
>
...
> strcpy(v9ses->name, V9FS_DEFUSER);
> strcpy(v9ses->remotename, V9FS_DEFANAME);
> + v9ses->dfltuid = V9FS_DEFUID;
> + v9ses->dfltgid = V9FS_DEFGID;
>
...
> +#define V9FS_DEFUID (0)
> +#define V9FS_DEFGID (0)
I'm not sure if there is a good solution here, but I'm uncomfortable
with using uid=0 as the default. I'm not sure if there is a default
uid for nobody, but anything is probably better than 0. Looks like
nfsnobody is 65534, we could use that - even if only as a marker for
the server to map it to nobody on the target system? What do you
think?
Particularly with attach-per-user, we probably need to look at
interacting with idmapd or create our own variant real soon.
-eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
