On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 01:41:08PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > The advantages of this approach over Andreas is basically that the 4k > filesystems still can be used as is. 4k is useful for binaries and for If you mean that with my approach you can't use a 4k filesystem as is, that's not correct. I even run the (admittedly premature but promising) benchmarks on my patch on a 4k blocksized filesystem... Guess what, you can even still mount a 1k fs on a 2.6 kernel. The main advantage I can see in your patch is that distributions won't need to ship a 64k PAGE_SIZE kernel rpm (but your single rpm will be slower). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
