In message <200709030648.20267.a1426z@xxxxxxxxx>, Al Boldi writes:
> Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> > The following is a series of patches related to Unionfs, which include
> > three small VFS/fsstack patches and one eCryptfs patch; the rest are
> > Unionfs patches. The patches here represent several months of work and
> > testing under various conditions, especially low-memory, SMP, and
> > preemption situations with an assortment of lower systems: ext2/3/4, xfs,
> > reiserfs, nfs, jffs2, ramfs, tmpfs, cramfs, and squashfs.
>
> To increase test-usage, it may be critical to always backport at least to
> the latest stable release, like 2.6.22.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Al
Al, we have back-ports of the latest Unionfs to 2.6.{22,21,20,19,18,9}, all
in http://unionfs.filesystems.org/. Before we release any change, we test
it on all back-ports as well as the latest -rc/-mm code base (takes over 24
hours straight to get through all of our regressions :-)
So we'd be happy to submit those patches to the latest stable kernel. But,
are you talking about VFS/ecryptfs patches (which are in the stable kernel),
or are you talking about Unionfs (which is not)?
Thanks,
Erez.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
