On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, David Howells wrote: > James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > + u32 (*inode_get_secid)(struct inode *inode); > > > > To maintain API consistency, please return an int which only acts as an > > error code, and returning the secid via a *u32 function parameter. > > Does that apply to *all* the functions, irrespective of whether or not they > return an error? LSM is theoretically an API, so we generally don't know if a security module will return an error or not. If they were simply calls directly into SElinux, where we could always know the semantics, then that would be a different story. - James -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
