Re: [RFC 12/26] ext2 white-out support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 31, Andreas Dilger wrote:

> On Jul 31, 2007  09:44 +0200, Jan Blunck wrote:
> > Ok, this is pretty similar to the way I implemented this for tmpfs. The
> > problem is that the union mount code is explicitly checking if the filesystem
> > is supporting whiteout. I used to use a new filesystem flag (FS_WHITEOUT) for
> > this but thought that disk filesystem like ext2/3/4 will have problem with
> > that if you mount an old image. So I guess I still need a feature flag.
> 
> You also need whiteout support for extents.  This could be done with
> unwritten extents potentially, or as I previously proposed (RFC) in
> linux-ext4.

Maybe. But this is about something totally different: a whiteout filetype, an
existing file that when it is found make the VFS return -ENOENT.

Cheers,
Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux