On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 11:26:18PM +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > On 28 Jul 2007, at 22:10, maximilian attems wrote: <snipp faulty patch> > This patch won't even compile! ntfs_debug() does not take a > superblock structure as the first argument... yup, hadn't looked up good enough those dprintk, sorry. > Also I want the inode warning to remain because it allows people to > know which inode it is so they can go and fix it by renaming it > something else for example. > > And the message does give the user a solution to the problem. Mount > with nls=utf8 mount option and you will not see those error messages > any more and everything will work just fine. > > The messages are all ratelimited thus should not spam the logs too > badly for users who choose to ignore them instead of doing something > about it... thanks for quick answer! user had asked for eventual quiet param, but i see no such in any other fs, so.. happy weekend -- maks - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
