Re: Hardlink Pitfalls (was: Patches for REALLY TINY 386 kernels)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 16 July 2007 20:23:04 +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
> Jörn Engel wrote:
> 
> > The only place that can ensure to always break the
> > link is the kernel.  Which is why I wrote the cowlink patches some years
> > back.
> 
> Can you post a patch against 2.6.22?

I can and probably will.

> > The still need a lot of love to be merge-ready.  But I do use them on a
> > daily basis.
> 
> Well, if the patch is lean and optional and runtime configurable, then they 
> should definitely be considered for inclusion.

Lean is not the word I would choose.  It works.  For me.  That is about
as much praise as it deserves.

Jörn

-- 
Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, but
not tried it.
-- Donald Knuth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux