On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 12:35 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote: > On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 09:59 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > > > > Kalpak Shah wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > >> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400 > > >> Mingming Cao <cmm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> > > >>> This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches. > > >> I don't know what the "old nanosecond patches" are. A link to a suitable > > >> changlog for those patches would do in a pinch. Preferable would be to > > >> write a proper changelog for this patch. > > > > > > The incremental patch contains a proper changelog describing the patch. > > > > > > > > > Instead of putting incremental patches it would be nice if we can have replacement patches. > > for the already existing patches with the comments addressed. For example if we have a > > review comment on the patch message ( commit log ) then adding an incremental patch doesn't help. > > I think that it would be easier to review just the changes that have > been made to the patches instead of having people go through the entire > patch again. I was hoping that someone with write access to ext4-git > would update the commit logs. > > If replacement patches are preferred, then I will send them again. > No need, I already fold your fix patch to the parent patches, so in the updated ext4-patch-queue it saved the updated nanosecond patch. > Thanks, > Kalpak. > > > > > > > -aneesh > > - > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
