Re: [EXT4 set 4][PATCH 1/5] i_version:64 bit inode version

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 22:09:08 -0400 Mingming Cao <cmm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> David Chinneer pointed that we need to journal the version number
> updates together with the operations that causes the change of the inode
> version number, in order to survive server crashes so clients won't see
> the counter go backwards.
> 
> So increment i_version in fs code is probably the place to ensure the
> inode version changes are stored to disk. It's seems update the ext4
> inode version in every ext4_mark_inode_dirty() is the easiest way.

That still makes us dependent upon _something_ changing the inode.  For
overwrites the only something is mtime.

If we don't want to have a peculiar dependency upon s_time_gran=1e9 (and
I don't think we do) then I guess we'll need new code in or around
file_update_time() to do this.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux