On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, DervishD wrote: > * Bodo Eggert <7eggert@xxxxxx> dixit: > > Standardisation is good, but autotools (as they are used) usurally isn't. > > Usually, by picking other's project configure.in and tweak blindly. If it were that easy to write a correct automake script, people would do that. Wouldn't they? > > Configuring the build of an autotools program is harder than nescensary; > > if it used a config file, you could easily save it somewhere while adding > > comments on how and why you did *that* choice, and you could possibly > > use a set of default configs which you'd just include. > > Looks like CMake... Obviously something I should look at. -- Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say: 45. Was that YOUR directory? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
