On Monday 02 July 2007 22:15, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > AA on the other hand just fucks up VFS layering [...] Oh come on, this claim clearly isn't justified. How on earth is passing vfsmounts down the lsm hooks supposed to break vfs layering? We are not proposing to pass additional information down to file systems. There is no barrier between the vfs and lsm hooks for vfsmounts even today -- only look at the inode_getattr hook; it already gets a vfsmount. Without vfsmount we cannot tell where in the namespace we are, but that information is essential for any kind of pathname based mechanism, AA or not, and even for plain reporting. LSM as a framework is supposed to allow different security mechanisms to be plugged in. It isn't flexible enough for us right now, and so we are proposing to extend it. What can be wrong about that? Andreas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
