Re: [AppArmor 00/44] AppArmor security module overview

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:27:17 -0700 (PDT)

> --- David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Neither of those are reasons why something should go into the tree.
> 
> They reflect the corporate reality of the open source community.
> If you're going to go down the "open source isn't for money"
> rathole please take it elsewhere. I've heard the arguments so many
> times I can sing them to the tune of "Lady Madonna".

That's a wonderful technical reason for apparmour to go into the tree.
Thanks for sharing and making it even clearer what is really behind
this submission.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux