On Wednesday 27 June 2007 01:46, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 16:15 -0700, jjohansen@xxxxxxx wrote: > > To remove conditionally passing of vfsmounts to the LSM, a nameidata > > struct can be instantiated in the nfsd and mqueue filesystems. This > > however results in useless information being passed down, as not > > all fields in the nameidata struct will be meaingful. The nameidata > > struct is split creating struct nameidata2 that contains only the > > fields > > that will carry meaningful information. > > I don't object to the concept per se, but could you please give it a > more descriptive name please? "struct vfs_intent" would be a lot more > accurate than "nameidata2". Yes, the name is pretty arbitrary. vfs_intent is better, even though the struct doesn't only include the intent data. Thanks, Andreas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
