Re: [patch 1/3] add the fsblock layer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 01:18:42PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> 
> > Hmm, could define a macro DECLARE_ATOMIC_BITMAP(maxbit) that expands to the smallest
> > possible type for each architecture. And a couple of ugly casts for set_bit et.al.
> > but those could be also hidden in macros. Should be relatively easy to do.
> 
> or make a "smallbit" type that is small/supported, so 64 bit if 32 bit
> isn't supported, otherwise 32

That wouldn't handle the case where you only need e.g. 8 bits
That's fine for x86 too. It only hates atomic accesses crossing cache line
boundaries (but handles them too, just slow) 

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux