On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 01:03:32PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > > > This takes care of all of the direct callers of vfs_mknod(). > Since a few of these cases also handle normal file creation > as well, this also covers some calls to vfs_create(). Ok. > diff -puN fs/namei.c~18-24-sys-mknodat-elevate-write-count-for-vfs-mknod-create fs/namei.c > --- lxc/fs/namei.c~18-24-sys-mknodat-elevate-write-count-for-vfs-mknod-create 2007-06-21 23:23:25.000000000 -0700 > +++ lxc-dave/fs/namei.c 2007-06-21 23:23:25.000000000 -0700 > @@ -1897,14 +1897,26 @@ asmlinkage long sys_mknodat(int dfd, con > if (!IS_ERR(dentry)) { > switch (mode & S_IFMT) { > case 0: case S_IFREG: > + error = mnt_want_write(nd.mnt); > + if (error) > + break; > error = vfs_create(nd.dentry->d_inode,dentry,mode,&nd); > + mnt_drop_write(nd.mnt); > break; > case S_IFCHR: case S_IFBLK: > + error = mnt_want_write(nd.mnt); > + if (error) > + break; > error = vfs_mknod(nd.dentry->d_inode,dentry,mode, > new_decode_dev(dev)); > + mnt_drop_write(nd.mnt); > break; > case S_IFIFO: case S_IFSOCK: > + error = mnt_want_write(nd.mnt); > + if (error) > + break; > error = vfs_mknod(nd.dentry->d_inode,dentry,mode,0); > + mnt_drop_write(nd.mnt); > break; > case S_IFDIR: > error = -EPERM; Should we just take the calls outside the switch statement? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html