On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 01:39:14AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Pavel, please focus on the current AppArmor implementation. You're > > remembering a flaw with a previous version of AppArmor. The pathnames > > constructed with the current version of AppArmor are consistent and > > correct. > > Ok, I did not know that this got fixed. > > How do you do that? Hold a lock preventing renames for a whole time > you walk from file to the root of filesystem? We've improved d_path() to remove many of its previous shortcomings: eb3dfb0cb1f4a44e2d0553f89514ce9f2a9fcaf1
Attachment:
pgphtCddVvWML.pgp
Description: PGP signature
