On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 10:00:56AM -0400, John Stoffel wrote: > >>>>> "Chris" == Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> As a user of Netapps, having quotas (if only for reporting purposes) > >> and some way to migrate non-used files to slower/cheaper storage would > >> be great. > > Chris> So far, I'm not planning quotas beyond the subvolume level. > > So let me get this straight. Are you saying that quotas would only be > on the volume level, and for the initial level of sub-volumes below > that level? Or would *all* sub-volumes have quota support? And does > that include snapshots as well? On disk, snapshots and subvolumes are identical...the only difference is their starting state (sorry, it's confusing, and it doesn't help that I interchange the terms when describing features). Every subvolume will have a quota on the number of blocks it can consume. I haven't yet decided on the best way to account for blocks that are actually shared between snapshots, but it'll be in there somehow. So if you wanted to make a snapshot readonly, you just set the quota to 1 block. But, I'm not planning on adding a way to say user X in subvolume Y has quota Z. I'll just be: this subvolume can't get bigger than a given size. (at least for version 1.0). -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
