Hi, On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 09:35 -0700, Marc Eshel wrote: > This is the return code that setlease() currently returns when the lease > can not be obtained. Although ENOTSUPP would be more accurately describing > the error it will be a new return code from setlease() that is currently > not expected by callers to setlease(), but either return code should work. > Marc. > I prefer EOPNOTSUPP as it more accurately describes whats going on here. EAGAIN seems to me to imply that its something thats blocking temporarily and that trying again at a later time might result in success, Steve. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html