On Jun 8 2007 07:57, shirish wrote: > On 6/8/07, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Jun 8 2007 02:09, shirish wrote: >> > >> > Is Binary prefix http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_prefix >> > something that could be incorporated in the next release. This would >> > make all the files report much more accurate >> > file sizes than now. >> >> What does this have to do with ext4? And where are you seeing >> the not-so-binary prefix? >> > Hi all, > I'm atm using ext3 & here file size are reported as either > KB and/or MB > so when the command ls -lah one gets those file-sizes. Hence I get something > like :- > > -rw-r--r-- 1 shirish shirish 3.5M 2007-05-14 00:54 allsopp_web_001.pdf or > > -rw-r--r-- 1 shirish shirish 3575572 2007-05-14 00:54 allsopp_web_001.pdf > > instead of > > -rw-r--r-- 1 shirish shirish 3.491MiB 2007-05-14 00:54 allsopp_web_001.pdf > > Two things, if we can just change it from using KB & MB to KiB & MiB > then it will be > used by lot of applications also ;) > > Lemme know what you guys think? This is *not* a kernel problem. Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
