On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 09:49:05AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 10:33:09AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote: > > The core of the problem is that HAL doesn't have entries in > > /etc/fstab, so you cannot check for "user=" and "users=" by > > umount(8). The HAL have enough information about user's privileges, > > but the umount(8) knows nothing. > > Please don't put this in. The last thing we need is more ugly hacks > and suid mess in the mount code. Miklos is working towards proper suid mess? Fortunately, we use external umount programs for all network filesystems. > non-privilegued mounts and you should better support him there. Yes, I look forward to his patches, but there is still a fstab check in umount. The current umount(8) code expects "user" or "users" option in /etc/mtab (or in Miklos's /proc/mounts) and *also* in /etc/fstab. Maybe the umount(8) code is too much paranoid and we needn't the fstab check, especially with non-suid umount(2). Miklos's patches also add support for "a submount under the owned mount" -- this is probably next situation when check against fstab is useless. Karel -- Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html