J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > At the moment, yes. Don't the POSIX and flock lock-handling routines in the > > kernel normally do that anyway? > > No, they'd upgrade in that case. I just checked. The OpenAFS server supports neither lock upgrading nor lock downgrading. Attempts to do either incur an abort with code 0x02f6df0a (which I believe to be equivalent to EAGAIN). This means that I can't practically support lock upgrading. Lock downgrading I can emulate by handing apparent readlocks to local processes whilst holding a writelock on the server. David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
