On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 09:40:36AM +1000, David Chinner wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 07:21:16AM -0500, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 13:16 +1000, David Chinner wrote: > > > On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 01:33:59AM +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote: > > > > > > Following changes were made to the previous version: > > > > 1) Added description before sys_fallocate() definition. > > > > 2) Return EINVAL for len<=0 (With new draft that Ulrich pointed to, > > > > posix_fallocate should return EINVAL for len <= 0. > > > > 3) Return EOPNOTSUPP if mode is not one of FA_ALLOCATE or FA_DEALLOCATE > > > > 4) Do not return ENODEV for dirs (let individual file systems decide if > > > > they want to support preallocation to directories or not. > > > > 5) Check for wrap through zero. > > > > 6) Update c/mtime if fallocate() succeeds. > > > > > > Please don't make this always happen. c/mtime updates should be dependent > > > on the mode being used and whether there is visible change to the file. If no > > > userspace visible changes to the file occurred, then timestamps should not > > > be changed. > > > > i_blocks will be updated, so it seems reasonable to update ctime. mtime > > shouldn't be changed, though, since the contents of the file will be > > unchanged. > > That's assuming blocks were actually allocated - if the prealloc range already > has underlying blocks there is no change and so we should not be changing > mtime either. Only the filesystem will know if it has changed the file, so I > think that timestamp updates need to be driven down to that level, not done > blindy at the highest layer.... Ok. Will make this change in the next post. -- Regards, Amit Arora > > Cheers, > > Dave. > -- > Dave Chinner > Principal Engineer > SGI Australian Software Group - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
