On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 12:34 +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote: > Jörn Engel wrote: > > On Wed, 16 May 2007 12:54:14 +0800, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > Personally I'd just go for 'JFFS3'. After all, it has a better claim to > > > the name than either of its predecessors :) > > > > Did you ever see akpm's facial expression when he tried to pronounce > > "JFFS2"? ;) > > JFFS3 is a good, meaningful name to anyone familiar with JFFS2. > > But if akpm can't pronounce it, how about FFFS for faster flash > filesystem.... ;-) The problem is that JFFS2 will always be faster in terms of I/O speed anyway, just because it does not have to maintain on-flash indexing data structures. But yes, it is slow in mount and in building big inodes, so the "faster" is confusing. -- Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
