On May 14 2007 15:14, Bharata B Rao wrote: > >--- a/fs/ext2/dir.c >+++ b/fs/ext2/dir.c >@@ -218,6 +218,7 @@ static unsigned char ext2_filetype_table > [EXT2_FT_FIFO] = DT_FIFO, > [EXT2_FT_SOCK] = DT_SOCK, > [EXT2_FT_SYMLINK] = DT_LNK, >+ [EXT2_FT_WHT] = DT_WHT, > }; > > #define S_SHIFT 12 >@@ -1292,7 +1301,7 @@ static struct file_system_type ext2_fs_t > .name = "ext2", > .get_sb = ext2_get_sb, > .kill_sb = kill_block_super, >- .fs_flags = FS_REQUIRES_DEV, >+ .fs_flags = FS_REQUIRES_DEV | FS_WHT, > }; > Hum. It's always so short. Would it offend someone to make that DT_WHITEOUT and/or FS_WHITEOUT? Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
