Re: [RFC][PATCH 14/14] tmpfs whiteout support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 14 May 2007, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> From: Jan Blunck <j.blunck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: tmpfs whiteout support
> 
> Introduce whiteout support to tmpfs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <j.blunck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  mm/shmem.c |    9 ++++++++-
>  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> --- a/mm/shmem.c
> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
>  #define LATENCY_LIMIT	 64
>  
>  /* Pretend that each entry is of this size in directory's i_size */
> -#define BOGO_DIRENT_SIZE 20
> +#define BOGO_DIRENT_SIZE 1

Why would that change be needed for whiteout support?

Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux