Re: [PATCH 1/2] LogFS proper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/8/07, Jörn Engel <joern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > +typedef __be16 be16;
> > +typedef __be32 be32;
> > +typedef __be64 be64;
>
> Why are those typedefs necessary ?

Not strictly.  I tend to use the be* types fairly often in the code and
simply grew weary of seeing the underscores.

Any objections if I seperate out the userspace headers and keep the
shorthands for kernel code only?

Not sure what you mean but I would prefer you drop the typedefs completely.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux