Quentin Godfroy wrote:
> + elf_ppnt = elf_phdata;
> + for (i = 0; i< loc->elf_ex.e_phnum; i++, elf_ppnt++)
> + if (elf_ppnt->p_type == PT_PHDR) {
> + phdr_addr = elf_ppnt->p_vaddr;
>
Won't this break with ET_DYN executables? And besides, isn't this the
same thing? Shouldn't PT_PHDR->p_vaddr point to the vaddr of the Phdr
table itself?
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
