On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Casey Schaufler wrote: > those names it cares about. SELinux in the absence of a correct and > complete policy could be considered dangerous. It should be noted that SELinux is only recommended as an addition to DAC, not a replacement, so that it can only further restrict existing access control. - James -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
