Re: [patch 05/10] Add "permit user submounts" flag to vfsmount

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>
> > 
> > If MNT_USERMNT flag is not set in the target vfsmount, then
> 
> MNT_USER and MNT_USERMNT?  I claim no way will people keep those
> straight.  How about MNT_ALLOWUSER and MNT_USER?

Umm, is "allowuser" more clear than "usermnt"?  What is allowed to the
user?  "allowusermnt" may be more descriptive, but it's a bit too
long.

I don't think it matters all that much, the user will have to look up
the semantics in the manpage anyway.  Is "nosuid" descriptive?  Not
very much, but we got used to it.

Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux