On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 05:05:50AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote: > struct fibmap_extent { > __u64 fe_start; /* starting offset in bytes */ > __u64 fe_len; /* length in bytes */ > } > > struct fibmap { > struct fibmap_extent fm_start; /* offset, length of desired mapping */ > __u32 fm_extent_count; /* number of extents in array */ > __u32 fm_flags; /* flags (similar to XFS_IOC_GETBMAP) */ > __u64 unused; > struct fibmap_extent fm_extents[0]; > } > > #define FIEMAP_LEN_MASK 0xff000000000000 > #define FIEMAP_LEN_HOLE 0x01000000000000 > #define FIEMAP_LEN_UNWRITTEN 0x02000000000000 > > All offsets are in bytes to allow cases where filesystems are not going > block-aligned/sized allocations (e.g. tail packing). The fm_extents array > returned contains the packed list of allocation extents for the file, > including entries for holes (which have fe_start == 0, and a flag). > One feature that XFS_IOC_GETBMAPX has that may be desirable is the > ability to return unwritten extent information. In order to do this XFS > required expanding the per-extent struct from 32 to 48 bytes per extent, > but I'd rather limit a single extent to e.g. 2^56 bytes (oh, what hardship) > and keep 8 bytes or so for input/output flags per extent (would need to > be masked before use). I'd be much happier to have the separate per-extent flags value. For one thing this allows much nicer representations of unwritten extents or holes without taking away bits from the len value. It also allows to make interesting use of this in the future, e.g. telling about an offline exttent for use in HSM applications. Also for this kernel<->user interface the wasted space shouldn't matter too much - if you want to pass the above condensed structure over the wire in lustre that shouldn't a problem, you'd have to convert to an endian-neutral on the wire format anyway. Not doing the masking also make the interface quite a bit simpler to use. One addition freature from the XFS getbmapx interface we should provide is the ability to query layout of xattrs. While other filesystems might not have the exact xattr fork XFS has it fits nicely into the interface. Especially when we have Anton's suggested flag for inline data. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html