Re: [AppArmor 37/41] AppArmor: Main Part

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 12 April 2007 12:37, Alan Cox wrote:
> The proc file system may not be mounted at /proc. There are environments
> where this is done for good reason (eg not wanting the /proc info exposed
> to a low trust environment). Another is when FUSE is providing an
> arbitrated proc either by merging across clusters or by removing stuff.
> [...]
> Why can't this be done in the profile itself to avoid kernel special case
> uglies and inflexibility ?

Good points. I'm in fact not sure how this could have been missed, and indeed 
it makes more sense to put this in profiles.

Thanks,
Andreas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux