> Did some performance testing of the fuse_perform_write implementation. > Result with a passthrough filesystem onto a backing tmpfs directory is that > bulk (1MB) writes are nearly 4 times faster (256MB/s vs 71MB/s), because > FUSE can send larger requests to userspace. Block based filesystems will > tend to be less dramatic, but could still be significant if block allocation > is batched, for example. Thanks a bunch, this is great news. Large writes are one of the most requested features for fuse. I did have a patch that does this in prepare_write/commit_write, but it's rather hackish, and I'm glad there will be a better way. Miklos - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
