On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:53:51 -0400 "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <jsipek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The following patches introduce new branch-management code into Unionfs as > well as fix a number of stability issues and resource leaks. I have a mental note that unionfs is in the "stuck" state, due to general agreement that we should implement this functionality at the VFS level, one reason for which is unionfs's upper-vs-lower coherency problems. Am I wrong? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html