Re: [ANNOUNCE] new new aops patchset

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 02:08:53AM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > BTW, I will take a shot at ext4 tomorrow.
> 
> Thanks, so long as you think ext3 is looking OK?
> 
> BTW. is it a known issue that ext3 fails fsx-linux? (I tried 2.6.21-rc3
> IIRC, and ordered and writeback both eventually failed I think). ext2
> does not.

Well I just tested, and it is not fixed by the recent patch to revert
ext3_prepare_failure....

Is this a known issue? Is it an fsx-linux shortcoming? It is fairly
surprising because it basically makes it impossible to test ext3
changes with that nice tool :( I can submit the traces if anyone is
interested, however I can reproduce in UML on an ext3 writeback
filesystem with no arguments (except the filename).

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux