Re: File system awareness (or lack thereof) of vfs granting of leases

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/18/07, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 12:32:42AM -0500, Wendy Cheng wrote:
> Robert Rappaport wrote:
>
> >[snip]
> >....   This is because the vfs running on the same node where the
> >samba server is running is not necessarily aware of all accesses to
> >the file on which it is granting a lease.  Since vfs does not
> >currently inform file systems about the granting and rescinding of
> >leases, a clustered file system cannot allow a samba server to support
> >OpLocks on its files and this has a negative impact on performance.
> >
> >What I think is needed is to add a file systems defined
> >file_operations function, that would be invoked when vfs is
> >considering the granting of a lease on a file associated with an
> >inode.  Such an enhancement would allow a file system to be come aware
> >of vfs lease activity and allow it to support this activity.
> >
> NFS has similar issues because Linux NLM-VFS does not invoke server side
> filesystem specific lock method. This implies NFS client applications is
> not able to use posix locks to coordinate file access across different
> nodes  with a cluster filesystem, even the cluster filesystem itself
> does support posix locking.

We also have the same problem with leases, since we're using leases to
implement NFSv4 delegations.  There's a simple-minded patch here:

        http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=bfields-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=4e8aff5dabe07b2e4e95ef0c741a34f65409087f

I'm not really sure if it's right.

--b.


Thank you both for your helpful replies.  In particular, the addition
of the calls to file system specific functions in routines,
fcntl_setlease() and break_lease(), as well as the modifications to
the file_operations and inode_operations structures, pointed to by
Bruce's reply, look exactly like the hooks that I would need to
proceed to resolve my problems.  Is there any timetable established
for these modifications to make it into a future release?  These hooks
would clearly benefit any cluster file system that has to deal with
leases.

- Robert Rappaport
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux