--- Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It's not really worth describing, since it's not > acceptable in upstream. > But it basically cycles vfsmnts and looks for > matches to guess which > part of the tree the dentry is in. Yick. Indeed, that would be bad. > This kind of change (or perhaps > straight to struct path) is definitely > needed from AA. It is certainly tempting to suggest that the path struct scheme would be better. The only argument against it that I see is the kind of changes you'd have to make to existing code. It's not even a matter of having to make changes, just which changes you make. Casey Schaufler casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
