On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 08:48:44PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > Actually, I wonder if there's any reason we couldn't also just give > posix_test_lock() the same interface as ->lock? (The latter uses the > same file_lock argument for the input and (in the case where it finds > a conflicting lock) the output, where the former uses an extra argument > to pass back the lock.) That'd make this a little simpler too. yes, giving posix_test_lock the same interface as ->lock would be even better. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
