On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 03:09:26 +0100 Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx> > To: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> argh. Yesterday all my emails were getting a mysterious s/osdl/linux-foundation/ done to them at the server, so I switched everything over. Now it would appear that they are getting an equally mysterious s/linux-foundation/osdl/ done to them. I assume you sent this to akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx? > Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Filesystems <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [patch 1/9] fs: libfs buffered write leak fix > Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 03:09:26 +0100 > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i > > On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 05:58:01PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 02:33:16 +0100 > > Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > I think just setting page uptodate in commit_write might do the > > > trick? (and getting rid of the set_page_dirty there). > > > > Yes, the page just isn't uptodate yet in prepare_write() - moving things > > to commti_write() sounds sane. > > > > But please, can we have sufficient changelogs and comments in the next version? > > You're right, sorry. Is this any better? yup, thanks. > (warning: nobh code is untested) ow. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
