On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 09:16:06AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > A little late since I sent some patches to akpm already, but I'm thinking > that this might be the better way to go. Rather than trying to have the > filesystems manage i_nlink, just make drop_inode for the filesystems be > generic_delete_inode. It seems that some filesystems already do that, and it > seems like that should do the right thing here too. This seems to be a little > easier to follow than messing with i_nlink. > > Does this seem reasonable? If so, I'll send this on to akpm and ask him to > commit this rather than the original pipefs patch I sent. Sounds good to me. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
