Re: [patch 6/10] mm: be sure to trim blocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 18:36 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>   							buf, bytes);
> > @@ -1935,10 +1922,9 @@ generic_file_buffered_write(struct kiocb
> >  						cur_iov, iov_offset, bytes);
> >  		flush_dcache_page(page);
> >  		status = a_ops->commit_write(file, page, offset, offset+bytes);
> > -		if (status == AOP_TRUNCATED_PAGE) {
> > -			page_cache_release(page);
> > -			continue;
> > -		}
> > +		if (unlikely(status))
> > +			goto fs_write_aop_error;
> > +
> 
> I don't think this is correct, see how status >= 0 is used a few lines
> downwards. Perhaps something along the lines of an
> is_positive_aop_return() to test on?

Hmm, if commit_write() will never return non error positive values then
this and 8/10 look sane.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux