On Monday 15 January 2007 8:25 pm, Nate Diller wrote: > I don't think we should be waiting on sync I/O > at the *top* of the call stack, like with wait_on_sync_kiocb(), I'd > say the best place to wait is at the *bottom*, down in the I/O > scheduler. Erm ... *what* I/O scheduler? These I/O requests may go directly to the end of the hardware I/O queue, which already has an I/O model where each request can correspond directly to a KIOCB. And which does not include any synchronous primitives. No such scheduler has previously been, or _should_ be, required. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
