On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:43:36 +0530 Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The s/lock_page_slow/lock_page_blocking/ got lost. I redid it. > > I thought the lock_page_blocking was an alternative you had suggested > to the __lock_page vs lock_page_async discussion which got resolved later. > That is why I didn't make the change in this patchset. > The call does not block in the async case, hence the choice of > the _slow suffix (like in fs/buffer.c). But if lock_page_blocking() > sounds more intuitive to you, that's OK. I thought people didn't like the "lock_page_slow" name. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
