Re: [PATCH 01/24] Unionfs: Documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 09:53:45AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 07:03:35PM -0500, Erez Zadok wrote:
> > However, I must caution that a file system like ecryptfs is very different
> > from Unionfs, the latter being a fan-out file system---and both have very
> > different goals.  The common code between the two file systems, at this
> > stage, is not much (and we've already extracted some of it into the "stackfs
> > layer").
> 
> I think that's an very important point.  We have a chance to get that
> non-fanout filesystems right quite easily - something I wished that would
> have been done before the ecryptfs merge - while getting fan-out stackable
> filesystems is a really hard task.

Hard or harder?

> In addition to that I know exactly
> one fan-out stackable filesystem that is posisbly useful, which is unionfs.

RAIF is another fan-out stackable fs with much more complex logic. (Just the
other day, I saw an announcement for a new version on fsdevel.)

Josef "Jeff" Sipek.

-- 
Evolution, n.:
  A hypothetical process whereby infinitely improbable events occur with
  alarming frequency, order arises from chaos, and no one is given credit.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux